In a recent Federal Court case, the Tax Commissioner successfully argued that over $1.6 million deposited into an Australian couple’s bank account constituted assessable income rather than a gift or loan from friends.

The Case: Rusanova and Commissioner of Taxation

The case of Rusanova and Commissioner of Taxation, reads like a telemovie. It involves an Australian-resident Russian couple who received over $1.6 million in unexplained bank deposits, accrued more than $67,000 in interest, a father-in-law who is a Russian seafood exporter, several Australian companies, and a friend who provided multiple loans in $20,000 instalments.

The key issue in this case was whether the couple could convince the Australian Tax Office (ATO) that these unexplained deposits were either gifts or loans, and what happens when the Tax Commissioner disagrees. If the Commissioner believes the deposits are income, he can issue a default tax assessment, which shifts the burden onto the taxpayer to prove otherwise.

The Unexplained Deposits

Between 2012 and 2016, the couple received around $1,636,000 in their bank accounts. The ATO became suspicious when neither spouse lodged tax returns, mistakenly believing they had no taxable income. The couple claimed the deposits were gifts from the wife’s father, thus not subject to tax. However, there were no records, texts, or emails to support their claim or even to acknowledge the receipt of these funds.

In addition, a friend of the couple deposited several amounts, including a series of $20,000 transactions over the course of a week. The friend asserted these were interest-free loans with no agreed terms, although he couldn’t recall how he was asked to make the loans. There were also no loan agreements, emails, or texts to substantiate these transactions. Oddly, around the same time, the husband was documented as repaying amounts exceeding what had been borrowed, including transferring a Porsche Cayenne to his friend in Russia as alleged loan repayment.

Further complicating matters, the husband held directorships in four Australian companies, none of which had lodged tax returns. One of these companies was involved in seafood wholesale, distributing products from his father-in-law’s Russian export business. The husband claimed he was merely helping develop his father-in-law’s business from 2010 to 2016 without receiving any remuneration.

Challenging the Tax Commissioner

In 2017, a covert tax audit led to the ATO assessing the couple’s income tax liability based on the unexplained deposits and expenses, issuing a default assessment. The couple objected, partially succeeding in having the assessment revised. However, when they contested the revised assessment before the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT), arguing it was excessive, their challenge was ultimately unsuccessful.

Can the Tax Commissioner Decide Your Tax Liability?

The Tax Commissioner has the authority to issue a ‘default assessment’ for overdue tax returns or activity statements based on what the ATO believes is owed, not what has been declared. Default assessments are particularly concerning because they may carry an administrative penalty of 75% of the tax-related liability, potentially increasing to 95% in cases of persistent non-compliance.

For the couple, the challenge was proving that the funds were indeed gifts, which are not taxable. However, the burden of proof lies with the taxpayer. The AAT held that without reliable evidence, there was no basis to determine if the deposits were part of the couple’s taxable income. As a result, the couple’s claim that the deposits were gifts or loans was dismissed by the AAT. Despite an affidavit from the wife’s father stating the funds were gifts, the couple failed to demonstrate what their actual income was or provide sufficient proof that the funds were indeed gifts.

The Federal Court dismissed the couple’s appeal, upholding the Tax Commissioner’s default tax assessment and associated penalties.

Avoiding the Gift Tax Trap

Gifts of money or assets are generally not taxed if given voluntarily, without expectation of something in return, and without the donor materially benefiting. However, there are circumstances where tax may apply:

1. Gifts from a Foreign Trust: If you are an Australian tax resident and a beneficiary of a foreign trust, amounts paid to you or applied for your benefit may need to be declared in your tax return. This rule can apply even if the money was indirectly received, such as through a family member who then gifted it to you.
2. Inheritances: Inherited money or property is usually not taxed, but capital gains tax (CGT) may apply when disposing of an inherited asset. For example, if you inherit your parents’ home, CGT generally doesn’t apply if the property was their main residence, they were Australian residents for tax purposes, and you sell the property within two years. However, CGT might apply if the property is sold more than two years after inheriting it, or wasn’t their main residence, or your parents were not Australian tax residents at the time of their death.
3. Gifting an Asset: Donating or gifting an asset doesn’t avoid CGT. If you receive nothing or less than the market value for the asset, the market value substitution rule might apply, potentially triggering a CGT liability. For instance, if parents gift a block of land to their daughter, the ATO will consider the land’s market value at the time of the gift. If the land’s value exceeds the purchase price, a CGT liability could arise even though no money changed hands. Similarly, donating cryptocurrency might trigger CGT. If you donate cryptocurrency to a charity, you might be assessed on its market value at the time of donation. You can only claim a tax deduction if the charity is a deductible gift recipient and accepts cryptocurrency.

Pitt Martin Group is a CPA accounting firm, providing services including taxation, accounting, business consulting, self-managed superannuation funds, auditing and mortgage & finance. We spend hundreds of hours each year on training and researching new tax laws to ensure our clients can maximize legitimate tax benefit. Our contact information are phone +61292213345 or email info@pittmartingroup.com.au. Pitt Martin Group is located in the convenient transportation hub of Sydney’s central business district. Our honours include the 2018 CPA NSW President’s Award for Excellence, the 2020 Australian Small Business Champion Award Finalist, the 2021 Australia’s well-known media ‘Accountants Daily’ the Accounting Firm of the Year Award Finalist and the 2022 Start-up Firm of the Year Award Finalist, and the 2023 Hong Kong-Australia Business Association Business Award Finalist.

Pitt Martin Group qualifications include over fifteen years of professional experience in accounting industry, membership certification of the Australian Society of Certified Practising Accountants (CPA), Australian Taxation Registered Agents, certified External Examiner of the Law Societies of New South Wales, Victoria, and Western Australia Law Trust Accounts, membership certification of the Finance Brokers Association of Australia Limited (FBAA), Registered Agents of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), certified Advisor of accounting software such as XERO, QUICKBOOKS, MYOB, etc.

This content is for reference only and does not constitute advice on any individual or group’s specific situation. Any individual or group should take action only after consulting with professionals. Due to the timeliness of tax laws, we have endeavoured to provide timely and accurate information at the time of publication, but cannot guarantee that the content stated will remain applicable in the future. Please indicate the source when forwarding this content.

By Zoe Ma @ Pitt Martin Tax